Contact Sales

Containers vs Virtual Machines (VMs): Which One Should You Use?

Containers vs Virtual Machines (VMs): Which One Should You Use?

Both containers and Virtual Machines (VMs) are powerful technologies used to create isolated environments for running applications. However, they work on different principles and serve distinct purposes. Choosing between containers and VMs depends on the specific requirements of your application and organizational needs.

Understanding the differences between containers and VMs is crucial for various stakeholders within an organization:

  • Developers: When designing and building applications, developers require consistent and reproducible environments to minimize compatibility issues. Containers, with their lightweight and portable nature, provide the perfect solution for maintaining consistency across development, testing, and production stages.
  • DevOps engineers: For DevOps teams responsible for deploying, managing, and scaling applications, the decision between containers and VMs can significantly impact resource utilization, deployment pipeline efficiency, and scalability. A thorough understanding of the tradeoffs between these technologies enables better decisions for optimizing infrastructure and processes.
  • IT managers: From an operational perspective, IT managers need to weigh the cost implications of using containers or VMs. Containers generally offer lower overhead and better efficiency, but depending on the workload, VMs may provide better isolation and control. Understanding these factors helps manage infrastructure and labor costs effectively.

By exploring the fundamental differences, benefits, and limitations of containers vs VMs, this blog post aims to help you make an informed decision tailored to your unique needs. Whether you prioritize speed, portability, resource efficiency, or isolation, understanding these technologies’ core principles is key to choosing the right tool for the job.

What are VMs and how do they work?

VMs are software-defined environments that emulate physical computers. They operate by creating an isolated, virtualized layer on top of a physical host machine’s hardware. This layer is managed by a piece of software known as a hypervisor, which is the core component enabling virtualization. 

The hypervisor acts as a bridge between the physical hardware and the virtual machine. It allocates resources like CPU, memory, storage, and network interfaces to the VM, allowing it to function as if it were an independent physical computer. Each VM has its own virtual hardware, including a virtual CPU, virtual memory, virtual disks, and virtual network adapters.

Inside this virtual environment, the VM runs its own operating system (guest OS), which can be different from the host machine’s OS. For example, you could run a Linux VM on a Windows host or vice versa. The guest OS is completely independent and unaware that it is running in a virtualized environment rather than directly on physical hardware.

Because VMs are isolated from each other and the host machine, multiple VMs can run simultaneously on a single physical machine, each with its own applications and operating systems. This makes VMs highly versatile and useful for tasks like:

  • Testing and development: Developers can test software in different OS environments without needing separate physical machines.
  • Server consolidation: Organizations can optimize hardware usage by running multiple VMs on a single physical server.
  • Backup and disaster recovery: VMs can be easily backed up and restored, simplifying recovery processes.

VM benefits

  • Strong isolation: Virtual Machines provide strong isolation between VMs and host systems. This ensures that applications running on one VM don’t interfere with others.
  • Better security: VMs are more secured compared to Containers as vulnerabilities in one VM don’t affect others.
  • OS capabilities: VMs can run different operating systems on the same hardware.

VM limitations

  • Boot speed: VMs have slower start-up and shut-down time compared to containers.
  • Efficiency: Virtual Machines are less efficient in resource utilization compared to containers.
  • Complexity: VMs are much more complex to maintain over a long period of time. An application running on multiple VMs becomes harder and labor intensive to update, especially if OS level updates are required.
  • Image size: VM images are significantly larger than container images due to the inclusion of a full guest operating system. This leads to increased storage requirements and longer deployment times.

What are containers and how do they work?

Containers are lightweight, portable units designed to package an application along with all its dependencies, configurations, and libraries. This ensures that the application can run reliably and consistently across different computing environments, whether it’s on a developer’s laptop, a testing server, or a production cloud environment. Unlike VMs, which virtualize the hardware, containers share the host OS kernel and provide lightweight, process-level isolation, making them significantly more efficient in terms of resource usage and startup time.

Containers share the host operating system’s kernel while maintaining strong isolation from other containers and processes on the system. This is achieved through technologies like namespaces and cgroups in Linux, which segregate resources and ensure that each container operates in its own environment with allocated resources such as CPU and memory.

Container benefits

  • Efficiency: Containers are highly efficient as they share the host operating system kernel, thus making them more lightweight and highly efficient compared to VMs.
  • Portability: Containers are compatible and portable across various environments such as local, development, staging and production.
  • Scalability: They can be easily scaled up and down depending on the demand. Container orchestration tools like Kubernetes are great for adding auto scaling capabilities to your tech infrastructure.

Container limitations

  • Security: Containers need to be configured very carefully. Misconfigurations in container images can lead to system vulnerabilities.
  • Performance overhead: Even though containers are more performant than VMs, still they have some overhead.
  • Learning curve: Dealing with containers often requires learning new technologies and getting familiar with additional tools for deployment, container orchestration and running applications across some non-standard environments.

Differences between containers and VMs

1. Isolation and security: VMs have complete isolation with dedicated OS and hardware resources whereas containers only provide process-level isolation while sharing the same OS kernel. This results in VMs being more secure in isolation due to complete hardware virtualization, while containers are secure but are potentially more vulnerable due to shared kernels.

2. Resource usage: VMs require more resources as each VM runs a complete operating system with its own kernel, thus requiring more CPU, RAM and storage. Containers share the host OS kernel and run in isolated user spaces, thus making them much lighter and provide fast start.

3. Portability and scalability: VMs are generally less portable as they include the entire operating system. Containers on the other hand are highly portable as they only package the application and its dependencies, not the entire OS. Scaling VMs typically involves provisioning new VMs with the Guest OS, this can be resource-intensive and takes longer whereas containers are designed for easy and rapid scaling. New containers can be spun up quickly, and containers can be horizontally scaled very efficiently.

4. Performance: Containers generally have lower overhead and higher performance compared to VMs as they share the host operating system’s kernel, while each VM has its own separate guest operating system.

Choosing the right tool: containers vs. VMs

When to use Virtual Machines

  • You have existing legacy applications that are not designed for containerization.
  • You require the additional isolation and security features provided by Virtual Machines.
  • Your applications require a significant amount of resources (CPU, RAM & storage) that may exceed the capabilities of a single container.
  • You need to run resource-intensive applications, such as databases, HPC workloads, or GPU-accelerated applications.

When to use containers

  • You need to quickly scale applications up or down based on demand.
  • Your application is designed using a distributed microservices architecture.
  • You want to enable developers to build, test, and deploy applications consistently across different environments.
  • You need to run a large number of small and lightweight applications.
  • You prefer local development and need consistent development environments without the overhead of lengthy and resource-intensive VM build processes. 

Hybrid approach

Some real world scenarios require a hybrid approach where you need a combination of both virtual machines and containers. In this approach, virtual machines are used as the underlying infrastructure, but the applications running inside the VMs are containerized. This allows organizations to take advantage of the benefits of containers, such as consistent deployments, resource efficiency etc. while still maintaining the isolation and control provided by VMs.

Best practices for working with containers and VMs

Containers

  • Use a container orchestration tool like Kubernetes to manage and scale containerized applications.
  • Implement a robust CI/CD pipeline to automate the deployment process.
  • Use official base container images from trusted sources. Or build your own, and store it in a secure place
  • Pin versions of the images to specific releases to avoid implicit updates, and it’s better to use SHA sums instead to protect against the push of a different image with the same tag.
  • Use container scanners to make sure your images do not contain critical or high-level vulnerabilities.

VMs

  • Allocate appropriate resources to each VM-based on its workload requirements.
  • Keep the operating system up-to-date with the latest security patches.
  • Implement proper snapshot management. Use snapshots to create point-in-time copies of VMs and regularly delete old snapshots to free up disk space.
  • Keep an eye on the NUMA nodes. Make sure your RAM and CPU are on the same one.

While these best practices provide a foundation, implementing them effectively requires deep technical expertise and experience. Naviteq simplifies this journey through comprehensive DevOps services, offering expert Kubernetes management to handle your container orchestration needs, robust CI/CD pipeline implementation for automated deployments, and Infrastructure as Code (IaC) solutions for consistent, scalable environments.

Real-world scenarios: choosing between VMs and containers

Selecting between VMs and containers often comes down to the specific needs of a business and the operational context. Here are two real-world scenarios illustrating the situations where VMs or containers might be preferred.

Scenario 1: a Fintech company prioritizing security and compliance

Company profile

A large financial institution handling sensitive data, requiring compliance with strict regulations like GDPR, PCI DSS, and SOX.

Why choose VMs?

  • Auditing and compliance: VMs provide clear boundaries for auditing and compliance checks. Auditors can easily review the security settings of individual VMs to verify adherence to regulations.
  • Enhanced security and monitoring: VMs allow the deployment of comprehensive security suites and monitoring tools, which is essential for institutions managing large volumes of transactional data.
  • Legacy system support: The finance sector often relies on legacy systems, and VMs are better suited for supporting these systems compared to containers.

Scenario 2: a startup scaling an e-commerce platform

Company profile

A fast-growing e-commerce startup handling variable traffic patterns and utilizing a microservices architecture for scalability.

Why choose containers?

  • Rapid deployment and iteration: Containers facilitate the quick deployment of individual microservices, accelerating development cycles and iterations.
  • Scalable architecture: Containers make it easy to deploy multiple instances of an application, allowing the startup to scale resources up or down based on traffic demands.
  • Cost efficiency: Containers are lightweight, using system resources more efficiently than VMs, which helps startups reduce infrastructure costs while maintaining flexibility.

Guidance for streamlined VM and container management

Choosing between containers and VMs is just the first step. Managing and implementing these technologies efficiently requires specialized expertise, particularly in fast-paced environments. This is where Naviteq’s DevOps as a Service comes in. Naviteq’s experienced team can guide you in making informed decisions and ensure that your infrastructure is managed effectively, whether you choose VMs, Containers, or a hybrid approach.

In the meantime, here’s a quick checklist that can help you decide on the best strategy for your requirements:

Application architecture

  • Microservice-based architecture — Containers
  • Monolithic architecture — VMs

Resource and budget

  • Strict regulatory compliance — VMs
  • Complete isolation for security — VMs
  • Cost-effective deployment — Containers

Operational requirements

  • Frequent updates  required— Containers
  • Variable traffic with scaling needs— Containers
  • Complex networking requirements — VMs
  • Quick setup across multiple environments— Containers

Security and compliance

  • Strict regulatory adherence— VMs
  • Sensitive data handling — VMs
  • Highly secure and isolated environment — VMs

Moving forward: making the right choice

Both containers and VMs have their strengths, and the right choice depends on your organization’s specific needs. By leveraging Naviteq’s expertise, you can ensure your infrastructure is set up in a way that supports operational demands effectively while managing costs and mitigating risks. Whether it’s secure VMs or scalable containers, Naviteq’s team can help you build a robust foundation tailored to your business.

Ready to get started?

Contact Naviteq today to learn how our DevOps experts can help you build and manage the perfect infrastructure solution for your business needs.

Back to blog

You might also like

The Sales Expert Analogy: Why Outsourcing DevOps is Like Hiring a Specialized VP of Sales
The Sales Expert Analogy: Why Outsourcing DevOps is Like Hiring a Specialized VP of Sales
Oct 15th, 2024
How to scale Kubernetes nodes on the AWS EKS
Grigory
How to scale Kubernetes nodes on the AWS EKS
Nov 6th, 2022